CPA FR : Financial Reporting

Unsere Website gibt unseren Kunden detaillierte Dumps Torrent für die Vorbereitung ihrer CPA FR Zertifizierungsprüfung, den Erfolg und die Leistung. Alle unsere CPA FR Prüfungsfragen und Prüfungsvorbereitung werden von unseren professionellen zertifizierten Trainern entworfen, um Ihre Fähigkeiten für die echte FR Prüfung zu verbessern. Wir halten das Tempo der aktuellen CPA FR Zertifizierungsinformationen, um die Prüfung pdf rechtzeitig zu aktualisieren und sich auf die Zufriedenheit der Kunden zu konzentrieren. Genaue CPA FR Prüfung Antworten werden nicht nur Ihre technischen Fähigkeiten verbessern, sondern auch das Selbstvertrauen der Kandidaten gut in FR der echten Prüfung zu verbessern.

Unsere Prüfungsvorbereitung umfasst eine Vielzahl von Zertifizierungsprüfungen, z.B.: Cisco, IBM, EMC, Oracle, etc. Sie finden alles in unseren CPA FR Dumps pdf, was Sie wollen, um die Schwierigkeiten der Prüfungsfragen in dem echten Examen zu überwinden. Unser professionelles Team hat FR Dumps Torrent vorbereitet, indem es das wachsame Auge auf die neuesten Prüfungsanforderungen hält. Und Sie können die kostenlose CPA FR PDF-Demo herunterladen und ihre Glaubwürdigkeit überprüfen, bevor Sie sich entscheiden, ob Sie CPA FR unser Produkt kaufen. Wenn Sie eine hohe Punktzahl in echter Prüfung mit weniger Zeit beim ersten Versuch bekommen wollen, ist unsere CPA FR Prüfungsvorbereitung absolut Ihre beste Hilfe.

Aufgrund der Zuverlässigkeit unserer CPA FR Prüfungsfragen geben wir 100% Geld-zurück-Garantie im Falle eines Versagens. Außerdem ist eine kostenlose einjährige Aktualisierung Ihrer CPA FR PDF-Demo nach Zahlung verfügbar. Die neueste wird an Ihre E-Mail geschickt, wenn es eine Aktualisierung CPA FR der Prüfung pdf gibt. Bitte zögern Sie sich nicht, uns zu kontaktieren, wenn Sie FR Fragen zu unseren Produkten haben.

Auf Windows/ Mac/ Android/ iOS (iPad, iPhone) sowie andere Betriebssysteme ist die Online Test Engine für FR Fragenkataloge auch verwendbar, denn diese basiert auf der Software vom Web-Browser.

CPA Financial Reporting FR Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen:

1. Rich Ltd has prepared draft financial statements for the year to 31 March 2013. On 5 June 2013, the accountant received a letter regarding an accident which had taken place on 14 March 2013. The accident had destroyed a machine with a net book value of $578,000. The company's insurance policy has an excess of $55,700. The accountant had taken this into consideration when drafting the accounts. The insurance company declined to pay the claim as they believed that the accident had been caused by negligence.
How should the information in the letter be reflected in the draft accounts?

A) A note should be included explaining the post balance sheet event
B) A charge of $522,300 is required
C) There will be no effect on the draft financial statements
D) A charge of $578,000 is required

2. Manz-Fi Ltd is entitled to receive a government grant of $8m on the condition that it will set up a garment factory in an underdeveloped area. The building of the factory started on 1 January 2012 at a cost of $10m. It is expected to have a useful life of 50 years.
What are the amounts of current and non-current liability (to nearest $1,000) in respect of extracts from Manz-Fi Ltd's financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2012?
(Use the treatment of "Record grant separately as deferred income")

A) Current liability: $200,000; Non-current liability: $7,707,000
B) Current liability: $160,000; Non-current liability: $7,747,000
C) Current liability: $200,000; Non-current liability: $7,547,000
D) Current liability: $160,000; Non-current liability: $9,800,000

3. For the year ended 31 December 2012, the board of directors of USP Inc. is considering the treatment of the following issues in their financial statements.
(i)On 1 March 2013 one of the machine used for manufacturing trading goods met the criteria to classify as held for sale. The carrying amount of the machine at 31 December was $50,000 and its fair value was $52,000. Costs to sell would amount to $4,600.
(ii)On 15 April 2013, USP Inc. settled a court case with a former employee, paying him $30,000. At the reporting date, the financial statement included a provision of $20,000 in respect of this case.
The financial statements were approved on 30 April 2013.
How should the issues above be dealt with?

A) (i) Non-adjusting event. Classified as a non-current asset held for sale at $47,400 with a disclosure resulting an impairment loss of $2,600.
(ii)
Non-adjusting event. Provision should be unadjusted. A charge of $10,000 to profits should be made in the following year end financial statements.
B) (i) Non-adjusting event. Classified as a non-current asset held at its carrying value of $50,000 with a disclosure resulting an impairment loss of $2,600.
(ii)
Adjusting event. Provision should be adjusted to $30,000, resulting in a charge to profits of $10,000.
C) (i) Adjusting event. Classified as a non-current asset held for sale at $47,400 with a disclosure resulting an impairment loss of $2,600.
(ii)
Adjusting event. Provision should be adjusted to $30,000, resulting in a charge to profits of $10,000.
D) (i) Non-adjusting event. Classified as a non-current asset held for sale at $47,400 with a disclosure resulting an impairment loss of $2,600.
(ii)
Adjusting event. Provision should be adjusted to $30,000, resulting in a charge to profits of $10,000.

4. BEATS plc acquired 75% of the ordinary shares in JOHN Ltd on 1 April 2012. BEATS plc has prepared a consolidated statement of financial position at 31 March 2013, which shows goodwill of $200,000 and consolidated retained earnings of $400,000. However, this consolidated statement of financial position has ignored the fair value of an item of plant held by JOHN Ltdwhich at the date of acquisition was $120,000 in excess of its carrying amount. The asset has a remaining useful life of five years.
After adjusting for the above fair value, what amounts should be shown for goodwill in BEATS plc's consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 March 2013?

A) $200,000
B) $110,000
C) $120,000
D) $80,000

5. IAS 19 is intended to prescribe when the cost of employee benefits should berecognizedas a liability or an expense and the amount of the liability or expense that should berecognized.
Which of the following statements regarding IAS 19 is correct?
i)A liability should berecognizedwhen an employee has provided a service in exchange for benefits to be received by the employee at some time in the future.
ii)An expense should berecognizedwhen the entity enjoys the economic benefits from a service provided by an employee regardless of when the employee received or will receive the benefits from providing the service.

A) (i) and (ii) both are incorrect
B) (i) is correct but (ii) is incorrect
C) (i) is incorrect but (ii) is correct
D) (i) and (ii) both are correct

Fragen und Antworten: